Barton v. Arxium, Inc.
Craig Anthony Barton |
Arxium, Inc. |
6:2023cv01284 |
July 10, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Paul G Byron |
Embry J Kidd |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Craig Anthony Barton. (Pearson, Warren) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Craig Anthony Barton. Related case(s): No (Pearson, Warren) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Craig Anthony Barton. (Pearson, Warren) |
Filing 10 ENDORSED ORDER discharging #5 Order to show cause. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 8/15/2023. (KM) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Persons by Craig Anthony Barton (Pearson, Warren) Modified text on 8/15/2023, COUNSEL NOTIFIED TO REFILE USING CORRECT CASE EVENT (JK). |
Filing 8 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #5 Order to show cause filed by Craig Anthony Barton. (Pearson, Warren) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Disclosure Statement by Craig Anthony Barton (Pearson, Warren) Modified on 8/15/2023 COUNSEL NOTIFIED TO REFILE USING CORRECT CASE EVENT (JK). |
Filing 6 NOTICE pf Pendency by Craig Anthony Barton (Pearson, Warren) Modified on 8/15/2023 COUNSEL NOTIFIED TO REFILE USING CORRECT CASE EVENT (JK). |
Filing 5 ORDER to show cause as to Plaintiff Craig Anthony Barton. Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's Order of July 11, 2023, directing counsel to file a Notice of Pendency of Other Actions and a Certificate of Interested Persons. Therefore, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE and file a response to said Order within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of the case without further notice or other appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 7/31/2023. (KM) |
Filing 4 ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 7/12/2023. (JOR) |
Filing 3 INITIAL CASE ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 7/11/2023. (KM) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Paul G. Byron and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:23-cv-1284-PGB-EJK. (ARC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Arxium, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-21024940) filed by Craig Anthony Barton (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pearson, Warren) Modified text on 7/11/2023 (MCB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Barton v. Arxium, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Craig Anthony Barton | |
Represented By: | Warren James Pearson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Arxium, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Warren James Pearson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.