Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Nelson Rodriguez, Jr. |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
6:2023cv01523 |
August 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Wendy W Berger |
Robert M Norway |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 Review of HHS Decision |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER directing parties to prepare and file any Brief as contemplated by Rules 6, 7, and 8 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions Under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Norway on 9/28/2023. (JBS) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Commissioner of Social Security. (Olszewski, Natalie) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Commissioner of Social Security. Related case(s): No. (Olszewski, Natalie) Modified text on 9/28/2023 (GL). |
Filing 9 SOCIAL security transcript of administrative proceedings by Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit p. 1001 to p. 2500)(Olszewski, Natalie) |
Filing 8 Notice of substitution of AUSA. Natalie Olszewski substituting for Nadine DeLuca Elder. (Olszewski, Natalie) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Nelson Rodriguez, Jr. (Fugate, Shea) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Nelson Rodriguez, Jr. Related case(s): No (Fugate, Shea) |
Filing 5 NOTICE: Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions Under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) became effective on December 1, 2022. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules also apply to this proceeding except to the extent they are inconsistent with the supplemental rules. The Standing Order on Management of Social Security Cases entered on December 7, 2021, no longer applies. The parties must review the supplemental rules to determine the governing deadlines, including the deadline to file the plaintiff's brief, the Commissioner's brief, and the plaintiff's reply brief. (RLK) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: The Middle District of Florida's revised Local Rules become effective February 1, 2021 and can be found on the Court's public website https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/local-rules. Additionally, the undersigned has issued Standing Orders, available at https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/judges/wendy-berger, that apply to all proceedings before the undersigned. For a just and efficient resolution of this case, the parties are DIRECTED to read and comply with the Middle District of Florida's Local Rules and this Court's Standing Orders. See Local Rule 1.01(a). Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 8/16/2023. (RMF) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Shea A. Fugate on behalf of Nelson Rodriguez, Jr. Lead Counsel: Shea A. Fugate. (Fugate, Shea) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Wendy W. Berger and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Norway. New case number: 6:23-cv-1523-WWB-RMN. (AA) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-21132695) filed by Nelson Rodriguez, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fugate, Shea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.