Canizales Sanchez v. McCleary
Carlos Ernesto Canizales Sanchez |
FOD, Orlando, USCIS Michael J McCleary and Michael J. McCleary |
6:2023cv01773 |
September 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Paul G Byron |
Leslie Hoffman Price |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 0702 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Carlos Ernesto Canizales Sanchez. Related case(s): No (Perez, Henye) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Carlos Ernesto Canizales Sanchez. (Perez, Henye) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of service by Carlos Ernesto Canizales Sanchez re #1 Complaint . (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope return receipts)(Perez, Henye) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Michael J. McCleary. (LNR) |
Filing 3 INITITAL CASE ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 9/14/2023. (KM) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Paul G. Byron and Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price. New case number: 6:23-cv-1773-PGB-LHP. (AM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michael J McCleary (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-21248823) filed by Carlos Ernesto Canizales Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Perez, Henye) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.