McNeil v. Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation
| Bruce McNeil |
| Bridgecrest, CFO Daniel Gaudreau and Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation |
| 6:2023cv01796 |
| September 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. Any motion for reconsideration must be filed within fourteen days of this order, comply with all Local Rules, and include the following: a certification that the pro se Plaintiff has personally read the Court's Initial Order and the Local Rules cited therein; an explanation for why the deadline was missed; and as separate docket entries, all missing filings. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 11/14/2023. (MEH)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Bruce McNeil. (EAM) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE by Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation re #10 MOTION to Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Sickles, Robert) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Sickles, Robert) Modified on 10/20/2023 (CTR). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert E. Sickles on behalf of Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation (Sickles, Robert) |
| Filing 8 PROOF of service via certified mail by Bruce McNeil (EAM) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 1/2/2020. (TNP)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation. Summons issued in person (AJS) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation with Jury Demand. Terminating Bridgecrest and Daniel Gaudreau filed by Bruce McNeil. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Bruce McNeil.(AJS) |
|
Filing 4
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: The Orlando Division of the Middle District of Florida is currently operating in a Judicial Emergency due to a judicial vacancy and the number of cases in the division. Accordingly, civil cases, and especially newly filed civil cases, will be the Court's lowest priority unless emergency issues are presented. Counsel and the parties are encouraged to consider consenting to the Magistrate Judge for the entire case or disposition of any dispositive motions in order to have their case considered on a more timely basis. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 9/22/2023. (MEH)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 9/22/2023. (MEH)
|
|
Filing 2
INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 9/22/2023. (MEH)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bridgecrest, Daniel Gaudreau. Filing fee $402, receipt number ORL-109329 filed by Bruce McNeil. (no original signature) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(AJS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
