Gupta v. Walt Disney Company et al
Anesh Gupta |
Walt Disney Company, Walt Disney Parks & Resorts U.S., Inc., United States of America, Margaret Iglesias, Tracy A. McCormick, Lisa A. Zamora, Kenneth C. Weir, Edgardo Centeno, Allison Sabatini and Andrea Molina |
6:2023cv01806 |
September 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Wendy W Berger |
Embry J Kidd |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER granting in part and denying in part #18 Pro Se Plaintiff Anesh Gupta's Motion for E-Filing Access in This Case and In The Alternative to Receive Electronic Service via CM/ECF. See PDF for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 11/17/2023. (ADH) |
Filing 19 ENDORSED ORDER granting in part and denying in part #17 Motion for Leave to File a Reply. On or before December 1, 2023, Defendant may file a reply that does not exceed 7 pages. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 11/17/2023. (Kidd, Embry) |
Filing 18 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically for E-Filing Access in this Case and In the Alternative to Receive Electronic Service by Anesh Gupta. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(RPB) |
Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Other Document :Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Motion to Dismiss Filed By Defendant by Walt Disney Company. (Scheck, Paul) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. |
Filing 16 RESPONSE to Motion re #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Anesh Gupta. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(EAM) |
Filing 15 Local Rule 3.01(g) Certification and Certificate of Service SUPPLEMENT re #12 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically for Assistance in the Service of Process by Anesh Gupta. (EAM) Modified on 11/9/2023 to edit docket text (LMW). |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Paul J. Scheck on behalf of Walt Disney Company. Lead Counsel: Paul J. Scheck. (Scheck, Paul) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Walt Disney Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Daniel Grossman, #2 Exhibit B - Order - Fairytale Fragrances v. WDC, #3 Exhibit C - Order - White v. Walt Disney Imagineering, #4 Exhibit D - Order - Buchanon v. WDW, #5 Exhibit E - Order - All Pro Sports Camps v. WDC, #6 Exhibit F - Order - Corwin v. TWDC)(Scheck, Paul) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically for Assistance in the Service of Process by Anesh Gupta. (EAM) |
Filing 11 PROOF of service as to Attorney General via certified mail on 10/16/2023 by Anesh Gupta (EAM) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS returned executed United States of America served on 10/17/2023, answer due 12/17/2023. (EAM) Modified on 10/19/2023 to edit docket text (EAM). |
Filing 9 RETURN of service executed on 10/16/2023 by Anesh Gupta as to Walt Disney Company. (EAM) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Anesh Gupta. (EAM) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Anesh Gupta. Related case(s): No (EAM) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (RMF) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: The Middle District of Florida's revised Local Rules become effective February 1, 2021 and can be found on the Court's public website https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/local-rules. Additionally, the undersigned has issued Standing Orders, available at https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/judges/wendy-berger, that apply to all proceedings before the undersigned. For a just and efficient resolution of this case, the parties are DIRECTED to read and comply with the Middle District of Florida's Local Rules and this Court's Standing Orders. See Local Rule 1.01(a). Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 10/11/2023. (RMF) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (EAM) |
FEES Paid by Anesh Gupta (Filing fee $402.00, Receipt Number ORL109538). (JG) |
Filing 3 ORDER: on or before October 11, 2023, Plaintiff shall either (1) file an Affidavit of Indigency or other application to proceed in forma pauperis or (2) pay the full filing fee. The failure to do so may result in dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 9/27/2023. (RMF) |
Filing 2 ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 9/21/2023. (JOR) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Anesh Gupta. No Filing Fee paid. No IFP motion filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(AJS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.