Parker v. Commisisoner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Parker
Defendant: Commisisoner of Social Security
Case Number: 6:2023cv01913
Filed: October 3, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Daniel C Irick
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 28, 2023 Filing 9 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:23-cv-1913-DCI. Judge Wendy W. Berger no longer assigned to the case. (RPB)
November 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER approving consent to jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 11/27/2023. (RMF)
November 21, 2023 Filing 7 PROPOSED CONSENT to trial by U.S. Magistrate Judge by Commisisoner of Social Security. (Bowie, Roberta)
November 21, 2023 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Commisisoner of Social Security. (Bowie, Roberta)
November 21, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Commisisoner of Social Security. Related case(s): No. (Bowie, Roberta) Modified text on 11/22/2023 (GL).
November 21, 2023 Filing 4 Notice of substitution of AUSA. Roberta Bowie substituting for Nadine DeLuca Elder (and Designation of Lead Counsel). (Bowie, Roberta)
October 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: The Middle District of Florida's revised Local Rules become effective February 1, 2021 and can be found on the Court's public website https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/local-rules. Additionally, the undersigned has issued Standing Orders, available at https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/judges/wendy-berger, that apply to all proceedings before the undersigned. For a just and efficient resolution of this case, the parties are DIRECTED to read and comply with the Middle District of Florida's Local Rules and this Court's Standing Orders. See Local Rule 1.01(a). Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 10/17/2023. (RMF)
October 4, 2023 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Wendy W. Berger and Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:23-cv-1913-WWB-DCI. (ARC)
October 3, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commisisoner of Social Security (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-21319289) filed by Elizabeth Parker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Liebenhaut, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parker v. Commisisoner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Parker
Represented By: Matthew David Liebenhaut
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commisisoner of Social Security
Represented By: John F. Rudy, III
Represented By: Roberta Bowie
Represented By: Nadine DeLuca Elder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?