Cohan v. Apple Nine Florida Services, Inc.
| Howard Cohan |
| Apple Nine Florida Services, Inc. and Apple Nine Florida Services, Inc. a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as Home2 Suites Orlando Airport |
| 6:2023cv02136 |
| November 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Gregory A Presnell |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Howard Cohan. Related case(s): Yes (Sconzo, Gregory) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Howard Cohan. (Sconzo, Gregory) |
Filing 4
INITIAL CASE ORDER (ADA). Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement and notice of pendency of other actions due within 14 days. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 11/6/2023. (AKC)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Apple Nine Florida Services, Inc. (EAM) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Gregory A. Presnell and Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:23-cv-2136-GAP-DCI. (ARC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Apple Nine Florida Services, Inc. (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-21427799) filed by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Sconzo, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
