St. Louis v. The City of Orlando et al
| Vladimir Isidor St. Louis |
| The City of Orlando, Kristen Brantley, Rebecca Rivera, Brandon Tabaczynski and Kevin Lopez |
| 6:2023cv02191 |
| November 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Anne C Conway |
| Robert M Norway |
| Gregory A Presnell |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER for Defendant City of Orlando. Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 1/16/2024. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 1/2/2024. (AKC)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss Count VIII of the Complaint by The City of Orlando. (Laskoff, Kimberly) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #7 Interested Persons Order, #11 Compliance notice, #8 Order directing compliance, #10 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF PLAINTIFF, VLADIMIR ISIDOR ST. LOUIS by Vladimir Isidor St. Louis. (Haynes, Carlus) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of compliance re #8 Order directing compliance by Vladimir Isidor St. Louis (Haynes, Carlus) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #7 Interested Persons Order, #8 Order directing compliance by Vladimir Isidor St. Louis. (Haynes, Carlus) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Vladimir Isidor St. Louis. Related case(s): Yes (Haynes, Carlus) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER directing Plaintiff's compliance to the Initial Case Order #7. Response due by 12/21/2023. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 12/7/2023. (AKC)
|
|
Filing 7
INITIAL CASE ORDER. Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement and notice of pendency of other actions due within 14 days. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 11/14/2023. (AKC)
|
| Filing 6 Case Reassigned to Judge Gregory A. Presnell. New case number: 6:23-cv-2191-GAP-RMN. Judge Anne C. Conway no longer assigned to the case. (RPB) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER reassigning this case to the Honorable District Judge Gregory A. Presnell for all further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 1.07(a)(2)(A). Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 11/13/2023. (KLD)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Kristen Brantley, Kevin Lopez, Rebecca Rivera, Brandon Tabaczynski, The City of Orlando. (CTR) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Carlus Leandrus Haynes of Local Rule 2.01(b)(2)(B), which requires members of the Middle District bar to maintain with the clerk a current telephone number, mailing address, and email address. Update your contact information for the Middle District through PACER. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (CTR) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Anne C. Conway and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Norway. New case number: 6:23-cv-2191-ACC-RMN. (ARC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kristen Brantley, Kevin Lopez, Rebecca Rivera, Brandon Tabaczynski, The City of Orlando with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number BFLMDC-21451501) filed by Vladimir Isidor St. Louis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons city of orlando, #3 Proposed Summons Lopez, #4 Proposed Summons TABACZYNSKI, #5 Proposed Summons Brantley, #6 Proposed Summons Rivera)(Haynes, Carlus) Modified on 11/13/2023 (CTR). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
