Torres Heredia v. Target Corporation
| KATHY HEREDIA-TORRES and Kathy Torres Heredia |
| TARGET CORPORATION |
| 6:2023cv02208 |
| November 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Wendy W Berger |
| Daniel C Irick |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Pierce, Francis) |
Filing 8
ENDORSED ORDER granting #7 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Ramon Vazquez is terminated as counsel in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 12/18/2023. (Irick, Daniel)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Ramon Vazquez to Withdraw as Attorney by Kathy Torres Heredia. (Vazquez, Ramon) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. |
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 1/2/2020. (TNP)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (RMF) |
|
Filing 4
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: The Middle District of Florida's revised Local Rules become effective February 1, 2021 and can be found on the Court's public website https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/local-rules. Additionally, the undersigned has issued Standing Orders, available at https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/judges/wendy-berger, that apply to all proceedings before the undersigned. For a just and efficient resolution of this case, the parties are DIRECTED to read and comply with the Middle District of Florida's Local Rules and this Court's Standing Orders. See Local Rule 1.01(a). Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 11/21/2023. (RMF)
|
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Wendy W. Berger and Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:23-cv-02208-WWB-DCI. (AM) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of compliance by TARGET CORPORATION (Attachments: #1 Exhibit NOF Notice of Removal_State)(Pierce, Francis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 9th Judicial Circuit Court in and for Osceola County, FL, case number 2023-CA-001357-ON filed in State Court on 3/20/2023. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-21465347 filed by TARGET CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT Complaint, #2 State Court ANSWER Answer, #3 State Court Docket Sheet Osceola Docket Sheet, #4 State Court Other Documents Other Docs, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Exhibit RROG_Pltf to Target, #7 Exhibit Medical Bills, #8 Exhibit Sunbiz, #9 Exhibit Affidavit of Graf, #10 Exhibit Intended NOR from State Court)(Pierce, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
