Bowman v. R & R Industries, Inc.
Johann Bowman |
R & R Industries, Inc. |
6:2023cv02470 |
December 26, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Paul G Byron |
Daniel C Irick |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 Family Medical Leave Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #6 Interested Persons Order by R & R Industries, Inc. (Sloan, Eric) Modified text on 2/22/2024 (AM). |
Filing 12 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by R & R Industries, Inc. Related case(s): Yes (Sloan, Eric) Modified text on 2/22/2024 (AM). |
Filing 11 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by R & R Industries, Inc. (Sloan, Eric) Modified text on 2/22/2024 (MCB). |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Eric Rodney Sloan on behalf of R & R Industries, Inc. Lead Counsel: Eric R. Sloan. (Sloan, Eric) Modified text on 2/22/2024 (MCB). |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 1/2/2020. (TNP) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Johann Bowman. Related case(s): Yes (Harr, Jason) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #6 Interested Persons Order by Johann Bowman. (Harr, Jason) |
Filing 6 INITIAL CASE ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 1/2/2024. (KM) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Jason L. Harr on behalf of Johann Bowman. Lead Counsel: Jason L. Harr. (Harr, Jason) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to R & R Industries, Inc. (AJS) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Jason L. Harr of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (AJS) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Paul G. Byron and Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:23-cv-2470-PGB-DCI. (RPB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against R & R Industries, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-21597962) filed by Johann Bowman. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Complaint)(Harr, Jason) See #1-2 for Complaint image- Modified on 12/27/2023 to edit docket text (AJS). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bowman v. R & R Industries, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Johann Bowman | |
Represented By: | Jason L. Harr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: R & R Industries, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Eric Rodney Sloan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.