Kincade v. Macy's Inc.
| Titiana A Kincade |
| Macy's Inc. |
| 6:2024cv00024 |
| January 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Paul G Byron |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER. The Amended Complaint #8 is DISMISSSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the file. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 2/7/2024. (ABP)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER to show cause as to Titiana A Kincade. Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's Order of January 5, 2024 directing Plaintiff to file a Notice of Pendency of Other Actions and a Certificate of Interested Persons. Therefore, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE and file a response to said Order within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of the case without further notice or other appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 1/30/2024. (KM)
|
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Macy's Inc. filed by Titiana A Kincade.(ARL) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER adopting #5 Report and Recommendations; denying without prejudice #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Complaint #1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint in compliance with this Order and all applicable rules and law on or before February 6, 2024. Failure to timely comply with this Order and file an amended complaint will result in the dismissal of this action without further notice. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 1/23/2024. (ABP)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 1/2/2020. (TNP)
|
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Titiana A Kincade. It is RECOMMENDED that the motion be DENIED withoutprejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 1/5/2024. (ECJ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick for Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 1/5/2024. (KM)
|
|
Filing 3
INITIAL CASE ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 1/5/2024. (KM)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Titiana A Kincade. (ARL) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Macy's Inc. filed by Titiana A Kincade.(ARL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kincade v. Macy's Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Titiana A Kincade | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Macy's Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
