Howard v. Osceola County et al
Michael Howard |
Osceola County, State of Florida, Office of State Attorney and 9th Judicial Circuit Court |
6:2024cv00037 |
January 5, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Paul G Byron |
Leslie Hoffman Price |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER denying #5 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 1/30/2024. (KM) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Reconsideration re #3 Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, by Michael Howard. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ARL) |
Filing 4 JUDGMENT in favor of 9th Judicial Circuit Court, Office of State Attorney, Osceola County, State of Florida against Michael Howard. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 1/10/2024. (CTR) |
Filing 3 ORDER. The case is dismissed. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and to close this case. Plaintiff's #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is denied. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 1/9/2024. (KM) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Michael Howard. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ARL) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price. |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Michael Howard. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (chambers notified)(ARL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.