Fuentes v. Commissioner of Social Security
Marcos A. Fuentes |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
6:2024cv00076 |
January 12, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Carlos E Mendoza |
Robert M Norway |
Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ENDORSED ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Norway on 1/16/2024. (MLS) |
Filing 5 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Carlos E. Mendoza and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Norway. New case number: 6:24-cv-76-CEM-RMN. Motion(s) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis . Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Norway. (ARC) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Sarah Patience Jacobs on behalf of Marcos A. Fuentes. Lead Counsel: Sarah P. Jacobs. (Jacobs, Sarah) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Patience Jacobs on behalf of Marcos A. Fuentes (Jacobs, Sarah) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Marcos A. Fuentes. (Culbertson, Richard) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. The plaintiff declines consent to jurisdiction of the United States magistrate judge filed by Marcos A. Fuentes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Culbertson, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.