Hopes, Jr. v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| James R. Hopes, Jr. |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC., TrueAccord Corp. and Sunrise Credit Services, Inc. |
| 6:2024cv00080 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Leslie Hoffman Price |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 TRANSFER to Tampa Division and assigned case number 8:24-cv-219-TPB-SPF. (MCB) |
Filing 4
ENDORSED ORDER transferring this case to the Tampa Division. It was opened in the Orlando Division by mistake. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 1/22/2024. (KMS)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to All Defendants. (HAI) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Carlos E. Mendoza and Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price. New case number: 6:24-cv-80-CEM-LHP. (RLK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AT&T Mobility LLC., Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Sunrise Credit Services, Inc., TrueAccord Corp. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-21653953) filed by James R. Hopes, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Exhibit A)(Dubbeld, Jon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
