Petitphait v. Winter Springs Police Department et al
| Rafael J. Petitphait |
| Winter Springs Police Department, Ofc. Aldridge, Orlando Police Dept., Ofc. Kuzma, Ofc. Darmalinjum, Ofc. Caliste, Ofc. Vanek, Ofc. Johnston, Ofc. Ducos, Orange County Sheriff's Office, Dep. Sellers, Deputy Sheriff, Dep. Kaiser, Dep. Lamos, Volusia County, Volusia County Sheriff's Office, Dep. Maletto and Hearing Officer Pullen |
| 6:2024cv00106 |
| January 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Paul G Byron |
| Leslie Hoffman Price |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ENDORSED ORDER re #10 Court Order. The time for filing an amended complaint has now passed. Accordingly, the case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the file. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 3/6/2024. (ABD)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER denying #11 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price on 2/28/2024. (SFC)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Hearing by Rafael J. Petitphait. (EAM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price. |
|
Filing 10
ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; adopting #5 Report and Recommendations. The Complaint #1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint, along with a renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis that is fully completed and signed, in compliance with this Order and all applicable rules and law on or before March 5, 2024. Failure to timely comply with this Order and file an amended complaint will result in the dismissal of this action without further notice. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 2/20/2024. (ABD)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of filing statement of claim by Rafael J. Petitphait re #1 Complaint (EAM) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Rafael J. Petitphait. Related case(s): Yes (EAM) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Rafael J. Petitphait. (EAM) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of change of address by Rafael J. Petitphait (EAM) |
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. For the reasons discussed herein, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that the Court: 1.DENY without prejudice the motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2); 2. DISMISS the complaint without prejudice (Doc. No. 1); and 3. PERMIT Plaintiff one opportunity to file an amended complaint, within a time established by the Court, along with a renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis, by filing a completed and signed Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form). Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price on 1/30/2024. (MKH) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to assigned Magistrate Judge for Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 1/25/2024. (KM)
|
|
Filing 3
INITIAL CASE ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 1/25/2024. (KM)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Rafael J. Petitphait. (not signed) (EAM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Rafael J. Petitphait. (no service copies provided)(EAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
