Hudson v. SFM, LLC
| Steven Hudson |
| SFM, LLC |
| 6:2024cv00150 |
| January 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Embry J Kidd |
| Gregory A Presnell |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Joint Motion to Stay Action and Compel Arbitration. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 2/20/2024. (LDM)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance and Lead Counsel Designation by Luis Santos on behalf of SFM, LLC. Lead Counsel: Luis A. Santos. (Santos, Luis) Modified on 2/16/2024 to edit docket text (AJS). |
| Filing 10 Joint MOTION to Stay Action and Compel Arbitration by SFM, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Arbitration Agreement)(Santos, Luis) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by T'Keara Nichelle Watson on behalf of Steven Hudson. Lead Counsel: T'Keara N. Watson, Esq. (Watson, T'Keara) Modified docket text on 2/14/2024 (JOS). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (GL) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Steven Hudson. Related case(s): No. (Watson, T'Keara) Modified text on 2/9/2024 (GL). |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Steven Hudson. (Watson, T'Keara) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to SFM, LLC. (CTR) |
| Filing 4 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Steven Hudson. (Watson, T'Keara) |
|
Filing 3
INITIAL CASE ORDER. Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement and notice of pendency of other actions due within 14 days. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 1/25/2024. (AKC)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Gregory A. Presnell and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:24-cv-150-GAP-EJK. (AA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SFM, LLC with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-21688935) filed by Steven Hudson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Summons to be issued.)(Watson, T'Keara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hudson v. SFM, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steven Hudson | |
| Represented By: | T'Keara Nichelle Watson |
| Represented By: | Anthony J. Hall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SFM, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Luis Santos |
| Represented By: | Viktoryia Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
