Corcino v. Osceola County Corrections Department
| Edward Corcino |
| Osceola County Corrections Department |
| 6:2024cv00177 |
| January 25, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Paul G Byron |
| Gregory A Presnell |
| Leslie Hoffman Price |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Cases associated: Create association to 6:24-cv-00166-PGB-LHP. ALL FURTHER FILINGS SHALL BE MADE IN THE LEAD CASE NUMBER: 6:24-CV-166-PGB-LHP. (EAM) |
Filing 7
ORDER. The Court consolidates into 6:24-cv-166-PGB-LHP ("Consolidated Case") the following related cases ("Related Cases"): 6:24-cv-00167-PGB-LHP, 6:24-cv-00168-PGB-LHP, 6:24-cv-00176-PGB-LHP, 6:24-cv-00177-PGB-LHP, 6:24-cv-00178-PGB-LHP, 6:24-cv-00179-PGB-LHP, 6:24-cv-00183-PGB-DCI, and 6:24-cv-00201-PGB-LHP. Any pending motion in a Related Case is denied as moot and without prejudice to be refiled by Plaintiff in the Consolidated case if appropriate. Each related case is administratively closed pending adjudication of the Consolidated Case. All subsequent filings shall be made exclusively in the Consolidated Case. The Clerk must: File this Order in the Consolidated Case and in each of the Related Cases; File in the Consolidated Case the complaint from each Related Case, and administratively close each Related Case. Please see Order for further details. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 2/9/2024. (KM)
|
| Filing 6 Case Reassigned to Judge Paul G. Byron. New case number: 6:24-cv-177-PGB-LHP. Judge Gregory A. Presnell no longer assigned to the case. (RPB) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER transferring the case to the Honorable Paul G. Byron to be considered with 6:24-cv-166-GAP-LHP Corcino v Osceola County Corrections Department. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 1/29/2024. (AKC)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Pre-Suit by Edward Corcino (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ARL) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Edward Corcino. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ARL) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price. |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Edward Corcino. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ARL) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Osceola County Corrections Department filed by Edward Corcino. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Mailing Envelope)(ARL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Corcino v. Osceola County Corrections Department | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Edward Corcino | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Osceola County Corrections Department | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
