Redding v. Orange County Department of Corrections
Darius Christopher Redding |
Orange County Department of Corrections |
6:2024cv00276 |
February 7, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Wendy W Berger |
Daniel C Irick |
Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER denying as moot #7 Motion to Suppress Statements, Admissions, and Confessions. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 2/21/2024. (RMF) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically to Suppress statement, admissions and confessions by Darius Christopher Redding. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(EAM) |
Filing 6 ORDER: Plaintiff's construed motion to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is DENIED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case file and mail to Plaintiff a civil rights complaint form and an affidavit of indigency form. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 2/15/2024. (RMF) |
Filing 5 ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 1/2/2020. (TNP) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: The Middle District of Florida's revised Local Rules become effective February 1, 2021 and can be found on the Court's public website https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/local-rules. Additionally, the undersigned has issued Standing Orders, available at https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/judges/wendy-berger, that apply to all proceedings before the undersigned. For a just and efficient resolution of this case, the parties are DIRECTED to read and comply with the Middle District of Florida's Local Rules and this Court's Standing Orders. See Local Rule 1.01(a). Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 2/12/2024. (RMF) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Order Referring Case to U.S. Magistrate Judge for IDEAL Program. See attached Order for important deadlines and information about the IDEAL Program. (TNP) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Darius Christopher Redding. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(EAM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Orange County Department of Corrections filed by Darius Christopher Redding.(no service copies provided) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Mailing Envelope)(Chambers notified)(EAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Redding v. Orange County Department of Corrections | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Darius Christopher Redding | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Orange County Department of Corrections | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.