Perkins v. Bywater
| Matthew D Perkins |
| Kyle N Bywater and Kissimmee Police Department |
| 6:2024cv01109 |
| June 17, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Robert M Norway |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CORPORATE disclosure statement by Matthew D Perkins. (ARL) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Matthew D Perkins. Related case(s): Yes (ARL) |
Filing 4
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 6/24/2024. (MEH)
|
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 6/24/2024. (MEH)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Matthew D Perkins. (EAM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Norway. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by Matthew D Perkins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(no service copies provided)(EAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.