Neven Eyewear, LLC v. Neven Eyewear, LLC et al
| Neven Eyewear LLC |
| LE VENTURES, LLC, 37 VENTURES, LLC, Neven Eyewear, LLC and Khoi Le |
| Rader Law Group, P.A. |
| 6:2024cv01204 |
| July 1, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Paul G Byron |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 29 Trademark Report electronically sent to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (MCB) |
| Filing 28 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MCB) |
Filing 27
ORDER re #25 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Neven Eyewear, LLC; 37 Ventures, LLC; Le Ventures, LLC; and Khoi Le are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate any pending motions and thereafter close the file. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 8/7/2024. (ABD)
|
| Filing 26 NOTICE of Charging Lien by 37 Ventures, LLC, Khoi Le, Le Ventures, LLC, Neven Eyewear, LLC (Rader, Andrew) Modified text on 8/7/2024 (BD). |
| Filing 25 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal without prejudice by Neven Eyewear LLC (Abergel, Brian) Modified on 8/6/2024 to edit docket text (JDR). |
|
Filing 24
ENDORSED ORDER granting #22 Amended Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Court does not deem a response to the aforementioned Motion necessary. Upon consideration of the circumstances, Defendants shall respond to both the Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunction on or before August 28, 2024. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 8/5/2024. (ABD)
|
|
Filing 23
ENDORSED ORDER finding as moot #20 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunction. See #22 Amended Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 8/5/2024. (ABD)
|
| Filing 22 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #21 Compliance notice, #20 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to #2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction by All Defendants. (Espinosa, Jorge) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of compliance re #20 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to #2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction L.R. 3.01(g)(3) by 37 Ventures, LLC, Khoi Le, Le Ventures, LLC, Neven Eyewear, LLC (Espinosa, Jorge) |
| Filing 20 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint , MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to #2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction by 37 Ventures, LLC, Khoi Le, Le Ventures, LLC, Neven Eyewear, LLC. (Espinosa, Jorge) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Actions by Neven Eyewear LLC (Abergel, Brian) Modified on 7/16/2024 to edit docket text (JDR). |
| Filing 18 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Neven Eyewear LLC identifying Corporate Parent Neven Eyewear LLC for Neven Eyewear LLC. (Abergel, Brian) |
| Filing 17 CORPORATE disclosure statement by Neven Eyewear, LLC .(Abergel, Brian) Modified on 7/18/2024 to edit the docket text (RPB). |
| Filing 16 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Neven Eyewear LLC. (Abergel, Brian) Modified on 7/16/2024 Summons not issued, no return of service filed (JDR). |
|
Filing 15
ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 1/2/2020. (TNP)
|
|
Filing 14
ENDORSED ORDER granting #12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting #13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Scott Shaw and Marra M. Clay are granted special admission to practice in the Middle District for purposes of this action pursuant to Local Rule 2.01(c), provided counsel shall register for and use the electronic filing system as adopted by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 7/8/2024. (Irick, Daniel)
|
| Filing 13 Amended MOTION for MARRA M. CLAY, ESQ to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-22269775 for $150 by Neven Eyewear LLC. (Abergel, Brian) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. Modified on 7/9/2024 to edit docket text (AJS). |
| Filing 12 Amended MOTION for SCOTT SHAW, ESQ to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-22269756 for $150 by Neven Eyewear LLC. (Abergel, Brian) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. Modified on 7/9/2024 to edit docket text (AJS). |
|
Filing 11
ENDORSED ORDER denying without prejudice #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; denying without prejudice #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; denying without prejudice #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Motions fail to comply with Local Rule 2.01(c)(4). Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 7/5/2024. (Irick, Daniel)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Marra Clay and Scott Shaw Local Rule 2.01(c), Special Admission - File a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Co-counsel with filing rights may electronically file the motion on behalf of the lawyer seeking Special Admission or the motion may be filed in paper format; Pay the Special Admission Fee; Submit a Pro Hac Vice E-File Registration through PACER. Visit www.flmd.uscourts.gov/for-lawyers for details (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (ARL) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Marra M. Clay, Esquire to appear pro hac vice by Neven Eyewear LLC. (Abergel, Brian) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Scott Shaw to appear pro hac vice by Neven Eyewear LLC. (Abergel, Brian) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. Modified on 7/3/2024 as to docket text (ARL). |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Scott Shaw, Esquire to appear pro hac vice by Neven Eyewear LLC. (Abergel, Brian) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. Modified on 7/3/2024 to change attorney name (ARL). |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to All Defendants. (ARL) |
| Filing 5 Trademark Report electronically sent to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (ARL) |
|
Filing 4
INITIAL CASE ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 7/2/2024. (KM)
|
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Paul G. Byron and Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:24-cv-1204-PGB-DCI. (ARL) |
| Filing 2 First MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by NEVEN EYEWEAR, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Jonthan Strauss Declaration, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Scott Shaw Declaration, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit, #14 Exhibit, #15 Exhibit, #16 Exhibit, #17 Exhibit, #18 Exhibit, #19 Exhibit, #20 Exhibit, #21 Brian J. Abergel Declaration)(Abergel, Brian) (chambers notified) Modified on 7/2/2024 as to docket text (ARL). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Neven Eyewear, LLC with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-22254067) filed by Neven Eyewear LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit, #14 Exhibit, #15 Exhibit)(Abergel, Brian) Modified on 7/2/2024 to remove capitalization (ARL). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
