Reisman v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
| Jason Reisman |
| Uber Technologies, Inc. |
| 6:2024cv01854 |
| October 15, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Embry J Kidd |
| Julie S Sneed |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER staying case. Defendant's motion to compel arbitration and to stay (Dkt. #12) is GRANTED in part and DENIED as moot in part. The motion is granted in that the case is stayed pending the arbitration. The motion is denied as moot in that the joint stipulation (Dkt. #14) negates the need to compel the parties to arbitrate. This case is STAYED pending further order of the court. The Clerk is DIRECTED to administratively close this case. Within seven days of the completion of the arbitration, the parties shall file the intended stipulation to dismiss this case with prejudice. Signed by Judge Julie S. Sneed on 11/7/2024. (AJL)
|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION re #12 MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Stay re 8 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File by Uber Technologies, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Platform Access Agreement)(Welstead, Christine) Modified text on 11/7/2024 (KME). |
| Filing 13 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Jason Reisman. (Gitkin, James) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Compel Arbitration, MOTION to Stay re 8 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File by Uber Technologies, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Alejandra O'Connor)(Welstead, Christine) Motion no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. Modified on 10/22/2024 (AJL). Modified text on 10/23/2024 (GL). |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by James P. Gitkin on behalf of Jason Reisman. Lead Counsel: James P. Gitkin. (Gitkin, James) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL All counsel of record of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MLB) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL James P. Gitkin of Local Rule 2.01(b)(2)(B), which requires members of the Middle District bar to maintain with the clerk a current telephone number, mailing address, and email address. Update your contact information for the Middle District through PACER. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MLB) |
|
Filing 8
ENDORSED ORDER granting in part and denying in part #7 Defendant's unopposed motion for extensions of time. On or before October 22, 2024, Defendant shall file its intended motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings. Unless otherwise ordered, within ten days from the date on which the court issues the order resolving Defendant's motion, Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's complaint, and the parties shall jointly file a Case Management Report. Signed by Judge Julie S. Sneed on 10/17/2024. (AJL)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT PENDING THE COURT'S RULING ON ITS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Welstead, Christine) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Uber Technologies, Inc. Related case(s): No (Welstead, Christine) Modified on 10/18/2024 to edit the docket text (MLB). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 10/17/2024. (JOR)
|
|
Filing 4
INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Julie S. Sneed on 10/16/2024. (GNB)
|
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Julie S. Sneed and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:24-cv-1854-JSS-EJK. (ARL) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Uber Technologies, Inc. (Welstead, Christine) Modified on 10/16/2024 (AA). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 9th Judicial Circuit, Orange County, Florida, case number 2024-CA-008042-O filed in State Court on 9/10/2024. Filing fee $405, receipt number AFLMDC-22610638 filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Other Documents, #3 State Court Docket Sheet, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Welstead, Christine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Reisman v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Christine L. Welstead |
| Represented By: | Taylor C. Silverberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jason Reisman | |
| Represented By: | James P. Gitkin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
