Guzman v. State of Florida et al
| Jesus Miguel Guzman, Jr |
| State of Florida, General Motors Company, Onstar LLC, Mike Towing and Autonation Chevrolet |
| 6:2025cv00415 |
| March 10, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Robert M Norway |
| Julie S Sneed |
| Contract: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD) |
Filing 13
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the file. Signed by Judge Julie S. Sneed on 8/28/2025. (KLD)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER to show cause as to Jesus Miguel Guzman, Jr. Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order why the Complaint should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(m). Failure to respond to this Order may result in dismissal of this case without further notice from the Court. Signed by Judge Julie S. Sneed on 7/7/2025. (KLD)
|
| Filing 11 OBJECTION re #3 Order, by Jesus Miguel Guzman, Jr (ARL) |
|
Filing 10
ENDORSED ORDER striking #8 Unilateral Case Management Report. The court does not accept unilaterally signed versions of this document. Plaintiff may refile this document after conferring with Defendants following their appearance. Signed by Judge Julie S. Sneed on 4/4/2025. (GNB)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Jesus Miguel Guzman, Jr re #7 Notice of a Related Action, #6 Disclosure Statement - LR 3.03 and FRCP 7.1, #8 Case Management Report (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ARL) |
| Filing 8 STRICKEN PER ORDER 10***UNILATERAL CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ARL) Modified text on 4/7/2025 (ABM). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Jesus Miguel Guzman, Jr. Related case(s): Yes (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ARL) |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Jesus Miguel Guzman, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ARL) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Status and Jurisdiction of Jesus Miguel Guzman Jr. by Jesus Miguel Guzman, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ARL) |
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Jesus Miguel Guzman, Jr. See Report for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Norway on 4/2/2025. (JBS) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER re #1 Complaint. Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or moved to proceed in forma pauperis. On or before Thursday, March 27, 2025, Plaintiff must pay the $405 filing fee or move to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Norway on 3/17/2025. (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(JBS)
|
|
Filing 2
INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Julie S. Sneed on 3/11/2025. (GNB)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Request for Immediate and Permanent Injunction against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by Jesus Miguel Guzman, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(MLB) (fee due. No IFP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
