Davis v. Mina et al
| Roosevelt Lavonne Davis, III |
| Sheriff John W. Mina, Deputy Derienne Briggs, Deputy Tyler Storts, Deputy Michael Salomon, Deputy Jacob Swenson, Deputy Jack Stine, Deputy Maira Ragon, Deputy Datema Griffin, Deputy Sienick Krysztof, Deputy Yagiz Cetindere, Steven Fernandez, Deputy Jonathan Cobos, Timothy Escandor, Garcia, Orange County, Sgt. Unknown #2, Deputy Unknown #3, Deputy Unknown #1, Deputy Unknown #4, Deputy Unknown #5, Deputy Unknown #6, Deputy Unknown #7, Deputy Unknown #9, Deputy Unknown #8, Deputy Unknown #10, Deputy Unknown #11, Deputy Unknown #12, Deputy Unknown #13, Deputy Unknown #14, Unknown, Deputy Unknown #21, Deputy Lt. Unknown #1, Deputy Unknown #40 and Captain Unknown #1 |
| 6:2025cv01020 |
| June 9, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Robert M Norway |
| Julie S Sneed |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis to the extent that the case may proceed without the prepayment of the entire filing fee; however, Plaintiff is assessed the full $350.00 filing fee for civil actions. The Clerk of Court shall MAIL a copy of this Order to: Orange County Corrections, P.O. Box 4970, Orlando, Florida 32802, Attention: Inmate Bank Account Department. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Norway on 9/19/2025. (LDJ)
|
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT re #1 Complaint by Roosevelt Lavonne Davis, III. (ARL) |
|
Filing 6
ENDORSED ORDER granting #5 Plaintiff's Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. The Clerk is directed to update Plaintiff's address and send him a copy of the docket. Plaintiff may file a motion for a temporary restraining order that complies with the Middle District of Florida Local Rules. In preparing his motion, Plaintiff should pay particular attention to Rule 6.01, which governs requests for temporary restraining orders. See Local Rule 6.01. Signed by Judge Julie S. Sneed on 8/26/2025. (DM)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically for Leave to File Petition for Protection, Notice of Change of Address, and Notice of Inquiry by Roosevelt Lavonne Davis, III. (Clerk responded with docket sheet) (ARL) |
| Filing 4 PRISONER consent form and financial certificate by Roosevelt Lavonne Davis, III. (Attachments: #1 Trust Fund Account Statement, #2 Mailing Envelope)(MSN) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER deferring ruling re #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed, he must, within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS after the date of this Order, either (1) file a completed Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate (if Plaintiff desires to proceed as a pauper and pay his filing fee as funds become available in his prisoner account) or (2) pay the $405.00 filing fee (if Plaintiff does not wish to proceed as a pauper). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send to Petitioner a copy of the Prisoner Consent and Financial Certificate form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Norway on 7/9/2025. (LDJ)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Roosevelt Lavonne Davis, III. (Attachments: #1 Trust Fund Account Statement, #2 Mailing Envelope)(MSN) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Norway. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Roosevelt Lavonne Davis, III. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Mailing Envelope)(MSN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
