Brown v. United States of America et al
| Antonio L. Brown and Teflon Tony |
| United States of America, Sheriff Wayne Ivey and The Imperial Wizard of the Invisible Empire of the Knights of the KKK |
| 6:2025cv01062 |
| June 16, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Paul G Byron |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice for abuse of the judicial process. The dismissal counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 7/23/2025. (KM)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER to show cause as to Antonio L. Brown. Within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE in writing why he should not be subject to sanctions (including the dismissal of the instant case) for abuse of the judicial process based on his failure to accurately apprise this Court of his litigation history. Failure to timely comply may result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal, without further notice. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 6/25/2025. (KM)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Antonio L. Brown. (No IFP)(ARL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
