Fleischman v. Richey et al
Plaintiff: Daniel Benjamin Fleischman
Defendant: Randall Seth Richey, Carola Pena and DOE Defendants 1-33
Case Number: 6:2025cv01366
Filed: July 22, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Paul G Byron
Referring Judge: Daniel C Irick
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2025 Filing 16 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (ARL)
October 2, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the file. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 10/2/2025. (KM)
September 8, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER to show cause as to Daniel Benjamin Fleischman. Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's Order of July 23, 2025 directing counsel to file a Notice of Pendency of Other Actions and a Certificate of Interested Persons. (Doc. #3). Additionally, Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's Order to Show Cause of August 13, 2025 directing Defendant to show cause and file a response within fourteen days. (Doc. #9). Plaintiff was warned failing to comply with the Order may result in the dismissal of the case without further notice or other appropriate sanctions. (Id.). Therefore, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE and file a response to said Order within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order may result the dismissal of the case without further notice or other appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 9/8/2025. (KM)
August 13, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER to show cause as to Daniel Benjamin Fleischman. Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's Order of July 23, 2025 directing counsel to file a Notice of Pendency of Other Actions and a Disclosure Statement. Therefore, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE and file a response to said Order within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of the case without further notice or other appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 8/13/2025. (KM)
August 8, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER denying without prejudice #4 Emergency Motion for Protective Injunction and Notice of Ongoing Retaliation. See Order for further details. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 8/8/2025. (ABD)
July 28, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ENDORSED ORDER striking #5 "Emergency Notice of Suspected Phone Spoofing, Electronic Interference, and Request for Preservation of Digital Evidence." The Local Rules do not permit the filing of such a notice, which also fails to comply with Local Rule 1.08. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 7/28/2025. (Irick, Daniel)
July 23, 2025 Filing 6 Proposed US Marshal 285 form by Daniel Benjamin Fleischman (JOS)
July 23, 2025 Filing 5 STRICKEN per 7 Order; MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically EMERGENCY Notice of Suspected Phone Spoofing, Electronic Interference, and Request for Preservation of Digital Evidence by Daniel Benjamin Fleischman. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Exhibits) (Chambers Notified) (JOS) Modified on 7/29/2025 to edit docket text (JDR).
July 23, 2025 Filing 4 EMERGENCY MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Daniel Benjamin Fleischman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Z) (Chambers Notified) (JOS)
July 23, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 INITIAL CASE ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 7/23/2025. (KM)
July 22, 2025 Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Daniel Benjamin Fleischman. (JOS) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick.
July 22, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Daniel Benjamin Fleischman. (Chambers Notified) (JOS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fleischman v. Richey et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Benjamin Fleischman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Randall Seth Richey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carola Pena
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOE Defendants 1-33
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?