Fernandez v. Burnett
| Fernando Gene Fernandez |
| Officer David Burnett and City of Ormond Beach, Florida |
| 6:2025cv02121 |
| November 5, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MOTION to Amend, MOTION to Vacate, and MOTION to Reopen Case by Fernando Gene Fernandez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Attachment, #3 Mailing Envelope)(JOS) |
Filing 13
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #12 Plaintiff's Motion for Permission to Use Electronic Filing. The Motion is GRANTED in part to the extent that Plaintiff seeks authorization to receive electronic notification of filing;2. the remainder of the Motion is DENIED without prejudice; and 3. the Clerk is directed to add Plaintiff's email, [email protected], to CM/ECF inthis matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 2/26/2026. (GHP)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically for Permission to Use Electronic Filing (CM/ECF) by Fernando Gene Fernandez. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JOS) |
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against David Burnett, City of Ormond Beach, Florida filed by Fernando Gene Fernandez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Mailing Envelope)(JOS) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MLB) |
|
Filing 8
ENDORSED ORDER dismissing this case without prejudice for failure to comply with the Court's Order to Show Cause at (Doc. 7). The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 1/6/2026. (MEH)
|
|
Filing 7
ENDORSED ORDER directing Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE within fourteen days from the date of this Order as to why they did not comply with the Court's #4 Initial Order and the Local Rules by failing to file their Notice of Pendency of Related Actions and Disclosure Statement. Alternatively, Plaintiff may cure their failure by fully complying with the Initial Order within fourteen days, thereby discharging the order to show cause. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of this action without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 12/9/2025. (MEH)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 11/19/2025. (ALL)
|
|
Filing 4
INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 11/19/2025. (ALL)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 1/2/2020. (TNP)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Fernando Gene Fernandez. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JOS) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David Burnett filed by Fernando Gene Fernandez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Mailing Envelope)(JOS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
