Marquez v. The Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) et al
| Nyulka Marquez |
| The Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE), The Florida Department of Revenue, Child Support Program, The Orange County Clerk of Court and The Orange County Sheriff's Office |
| 6:2025cv02451 |
| December 19, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Leslie Hoffman Price |
| Julie S Sneed |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ENDORSED ORDER denying Plaintiff's renewed pro se motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (Dkt. #15). (See also Dkt. #16.) The motion still violates the Local Rules. (See Dkts. #11, 13.) Further, for the reasons explained in the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (Dkt. #14), Plaintiff has not demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits. See Gissendaner v. Ga. Dep't of Corr., 779 F.3d 1275, 1280 (11th Cir. 2015) (explaining that the party moving for the temporary restraining order or similar preliminary injunctive relief must establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits); Fla. Immigrant Coal. v. Uthmeier, 778 F. Supp. 3d 1315, 1320 (S.D. Fla. 2025) (same). In the future, if warranted, Plaintiff may again renew her motion, provided that she fully complies with the Local Rules. Signed by Judge Julie S. Sneed on 2/13/2026. (AJL)
|
|
Filing 17
ENDORSED ORDER discharging #10 Order to show cause. Signed by Judge Julie S. Sneed on 2/12/2026. (GNB)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of compliance by Nyulka Marquez. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JOS) |
| Filing 15 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Nyulka Marquez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Proposed Order, #6 Mailing Envelope) (Chambers Notified) (JOS) |
| Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #8 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. For the reasons discussed herein, the undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS that the Court: 1. DENY without prejudice the motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 8); 2. DISMISS the complaint without prejudice (Doc. No. 1); and 3. PERMIT Plaintiff to file an amended complaint, within a time established by the Court, along with a renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price on 2/9/2026. (MKH) |
|
Filing 13
ENDORSED ORDER denying #11 Plaintiff's pro se motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. The motion violates the Local Rules (available at the court's https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/sites/flmd/files/flmd-amended-local-rules-effective-november-01-2025.pdf webpage). For example, the motion does not fully comply with Local Rule 1.08, which sets the typography requirements for all filings in this case. Further, Local Rule 3.01(b) requires any motion to include a legal memorandum, and "[v]iolations of this rule are found where," as here, "motions are inappropriately short and lack any legal support for the movant's arguments," Vega v. Geico Gen. Ins. Co., No. 8:21-cv-1450-MSS-AAS, 2022 WL 1081565, at *2, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66715, at *4 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 11, 2022). Although courts "give liberal construction" to pro se filings, Albra v. Advan, Inc., 490 F.3d 826, 829 (11th Cir. 2007), pro se parties like Plaintiff still must follow procedural rules, including the Local Rules, see Loren v. Sasser, 309 F.3d 1296, 1304 (11th Cir. 2002). Because this order resolves a motion for a temporary restraining order, Plaintiff shall comply with Local Rule 6.01(c) by immediately serving on Defendants this order as well as the documents listed in the rule. Plaintiff may submit another motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction after Plaintiff files a notice with the court showing that the service required under Local Rule 6.01(c) has been effected; however, any such motion shall fully satisfy the Local Rules. Signed by Judge Julie S. Sneed on 2/6/2026. (AJL)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #10 Order to show cause, and Notice of Pendency of Other Actions filed by Nyulka Marquez. (JOS) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Nyulka Marquez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Proposed Order, #6 Mailing Envelope) (Chambers Notified) (JOS) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to Nyulka Marquez. Plaintiff has failed to comply with the court's Order #3. Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE and file a response to said Order within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of the case without further notice or other appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Julie S. Sneed on 1/30/2026. (GNB)
|
| Filing 9 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Nyulka Marquez. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JOS) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Nyulka Marquez. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JOS) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price. |
|
Filing 7
ORDER striking 6 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. It is ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall either pay the filing fee in full or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, which motion must be supported by a completed Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form). The Application may include only the initials for any minor children. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a)(3). Failure to comply with this Order will result in a recommendation that the case be dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule 3.10. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail a copy of the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) to Plaintiff, along with a copy of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price on 1/15/2026. (MKH)
|
| Filing 6 STRICKEN AND REMOVED PER #7 ORDER. MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Nyulka Marquez. (JOS) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price. Modified docket text on 1/15/2026 (JOS). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER to show cause as to Plaintiff Nyulka Marquez. It is ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE in writing why this matter should not be dismissed. It is further ORDERED that on or before this same deadline, Plaintiff shall either pay the filing fee in full or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, which motion must be supported by a completed Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form). Failure to comply with this Order will result in a recommendation that the case be dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule 3.10. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail a copy of the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) to Plaintiff, along with a copy of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price on 12/23/2025. (MKH)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Plaintiff's Motion for CM/ECF Filing Access. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price on 12/23/2025. (MKH)
|
|
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Julie S. Sneed on 12/22/2025. (GNB)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically for CM/ECF Filing Access by Nyulka Marquez. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JOS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE), The Florida Department of Revenue, Child Support Program, The Orange County Clerk of Court, The Orange County Sheriff's Office with Jury Demand filed by Nyulka Marquez. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (No IFP) (JOS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
