Magnuson Products, LLC v. VMP Tuning, Inc.
| Magnuson Products, LLC |
| VMP Tuning, Inc doing business as VMP Performance |
| 6:2026cv00520 |
| March 6, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Gregory A Presnell |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by VMP Tuning, Inc.(Jakes, Frank) |
| Filing 12 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by VMP Tuning, Inc. (Jakes, Frank) |
Filing 11
INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER for Defendant. Disclosure Statement due by 4/17/2026. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 4/3/2026. (AKC)
|
Filing 10
ENDORSED ORDER granting #9 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant must respond to the Complaint by 4/20/2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 4/2/2026. (Irick, Daniel)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by VMP Tuning, Inc. (Jakes, Frank) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Magnuson Products, LLC. Related case(s): No (Gonya, Patrick) |
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Magnuson Products, LLC. (Gonya, Patrick) |
Filing 6
ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 1/2/2020. (TNP)
|
Filing 5
INITIAL CASE ORDER - Notice of pendency of other actions and Disclosure Statement due within 14 days. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 3/11/2026. (AKC)
|
| Filing 4 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Gregory A. Presnell and Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:26-cv-520-GAP-DCI. (RLD) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to VMP Tuning, Inc. (RLD) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Patrick E. Gonya, Jr on behalf of Magnuson Products, LLC. Lead Counsel: Patrick E. Gonya, Jr. (Gonya, Patrick) Modified text on 3/10/2026 (LAW). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-24575180) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A to Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex. B to Complaint, #3 Exhibit Ex. C to Complaint, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Proposed Summons)(Gonya, Patrick) Modified text on 3/10/2026 (LAW). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Magnuson Products, LLC v. VMP Tuning, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Magnuson Products, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Patrick E. Gonya, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: VMP Tuning, Inc doing business as VMP Performance | |
| Represented By: | Frank R. Jakes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.