Rodriguez v. Broder Bros., Co. d/b/a Alpha Broder
| Nelson Rodriguez |
| Broder Bros., Co. doing business as Alpha Broder |
| 6:2026cv00588 |
| March 16, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Leslie Hoffman Price |
| Julie S Sneed |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ENDORSED ORDER granting #7 Defendant's unopposed motion to stay proceedings pending the arbitration. All deadlines are temporarily STAYED until further notice pending the outcome of arbitration. The parties are reminded of their continuing obligation under local rule 3.09 to promptly advise the court of a resolution in this matter. The Clerk is DIRECTED to administratively close this case. Signed by Judge Julie S. Sneed on 3/25/2026. (MSB)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration by Broder Bros., Co. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Peppard, Lara) Modified on 3/24/2026 to edit the docket text (MLB). |
Filing 6
INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Julie S. Sneed on 3/20/2026. (GNB)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Brien Vaughn Squires on behalf of Nelson Rodriguez. Lead Counsel: Brien V. Squires. (Squires, Brien) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Lara J. Peppard on behalf of Broder Bros., Co.. Lead Counsel: Lara J. Peppard. (Peppard, Lara) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL All Counsel of Record of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JOS) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Julie S. Sneed and Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price. New case number: 6:26-cv-588-JSS-LHP. (ARL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County, FL, case number 2025-CA-010571-O filed in State Court on October 27, 2025. Filing fee $405, receipt number AFLMDC-24618727 filed by Broder Bros., Co. d/b/a Alpha Broder. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit Exhibit B, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Peppard, Lara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Broder Bros., Co. d/b/a Alpha Broder | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nelson Rodriguez | |
| Represented By: | Christiane L Nolton |
| Represented By: | Brien Vaughn Squires |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Broder Bros., Co. doing business as Alpha Broder | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Gardner |
| Represented By: | Lara J. Peppard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.