Martinez v. South College et al
| Jorge Martinez |
| South College, Beth Leahy, Claudine Bentham, Keturah Corneille, Mia Thomas-Wolfe and Larrinn Bay |
| 6:2026cv00690 |
| April 1, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Jorge Martinez. (ARL) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Jorge Martinez. Related case(s): No (ARL) |
Filing 4
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 4/2/2026. (ALL)
|
|
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 4/2/2026. (ALL)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Jorge Martinez. (ARL) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by Jorge Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ARL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
