Damon v. Orange County, Florida et al
| Corey Matthew Damon |
| Orange County, Florida, Supervisor John Doe, John Doe Correctional Officer 1, John Doe Correctional Officer 2 and John Doe Medical Staff 1 |
| 6:2026cv00801 |
| April 13, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Nathan W Hill |
| Anne-Leigh Gaylord Moe |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 CERTIFICATE of Compliance with Rule 11 by Corey Matthew Damon. (JOS) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of compliance re #18 Order and Certificate of Compliance with Rule 11 by Orange County, Florida (O'Connell, Caden) |
Filing 18
STANDING ORDER REQUIRING DISCLOSURE OF USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. Signed by Judge Anne-Leigh Gaylord Moe on 5/27/2026. (TAH)
|
| Filing 17 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by Corey Matthew Damon. (JOS) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE by Orange County, Florida Certification of No Third-Party Litigation Funding (O'Connell, Caden) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nathan W. Hill on 5/13/2026. (JOR)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by Corey Matthew Damon. (Attachments: #1 Second Amended Complaint, #2 Mailing Envelope)(JOS) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nathan W. Hill. |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Caden Michael O'Connell on behalf of Orange County, Florida (O'Connell, Caden) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of No Third-Party Litigation Funding by Corey Matthew Damon. (JOS) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint by Orange County, Florida. (Morris, Garland) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Garland Clay Morris on behalf of Orange County, Florida (Morris, Garland) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER REQUIRING DISCLOSURE OF THIRD-PARTY LITIGATION FUNDING. Signed by Judge Anne-Leigh Gaylord Moe on 4/30/2026. (RMF)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (RMF) |
|
Filing 7
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: The Middle District of Florida's revised Local Rules became effective November 1, 2025, and can be found on the Court's public website https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/local-rules. For a just and efficient resolution of this case, the parties are DIRECTED to read and comply with the Middle District of Florida's Local Rules. See Local Rule 1.01(a). Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Anne-Leigh Gaylord Moe on 4/30/2026. (RMF)
|
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against John Doe, Orange County, Florida, John Doe Correctional Officer 1, John Doe Correctional Officer 2, John Doe Medical Staff 1 with Jury Demand. Terminating John Doe and Jane Doe Correctional Officers 1-10 and John Doe and Jane Doe Medical Staff 1-5 filed by Corey Matthew Damon. Related document: #1 Complaint, filed by Corey Matthew Damon.(JOS) |
| Filing 5 RETURN of service executed on 04/20/2026 by Corey Matthew Damon as to Orange County, Florida. (JOS) |
|
Filing 4
ENDORSED ORDER dismissing #1 Complaint for failure to comply with technical pleading requirements. The Complaint asserts "multiple claims against multiple defendants without specifying which of the defendants are responsible for which acts or omissions, or which of the defendants the claim is brought against." Weiland v. Palm Beach Cnty. Sheriff's Off., 792 F.3d 1313, 1323 (11th Cir. 2015). The Complaint ultimately fails to "give the defendants adequate notice of the claims against them and the grounds upon which each claim rests." Additionally, the Complaint does not comply with Local Rule 1.08. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint that complies with all applicable federal and local rules by April 30. Failure to timely comply may result in dismissal without further notice. Furthermore, #3 Plaintiff's Notice of Unavailability is stricken, and the Clerk is directed to remove it from the docket. Signed by Judge Anne-Leigh Gaylord Moe on 4/16/2026. (TAH)
|
| Filing 3 ***STRICKEN PURSUANT TO COURT'S 4 ORDER*** NOTICE of Unavailability by Corey Matthew Damon. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JOS) Modified text on 4/17/2026 (AA). |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS issued as to Orange County, Florida. (JOS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand Filing fee $405.00, receipt number ORL-118335 filed by Corey Matthew Damon. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Civil Cover Sheet, #11 Mailing Envelope)(JOS) (Attachment 11 replaced on 4/14/2026 to add back of envelope) (JOS). Modified docket text on 4/14/2026 (JOS). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
