Alarcon Viltre v. Secretary of United States Department of Homeland Security et al
| Reinier Alarcon Viltre |
| Secretary of United States Department of Homeland Security, Attorney General Todd Blanche, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Executive Office For Immigration Review, Miami Field Office Director, Orange County Sheriff and Warden, Orange County Jail |
| 6:2026cv00894 |
| April 22, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Leslie Hoffman Price |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 PROOF of service - Markwayne Mullin served on 6/3/2026. (AM) |
| Filing 10 PROOF of service - United States Department of Homeland Security - Unsigned - Not dated. (AM) |
| Filing 9 PROOF of service - Attorney General of the United States served on 5/6/2026. (AM) |
Filing 8
It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is GRANTED. Respondents, and all other persons or entities acting in active concert or participation with them are DIRECTED to immediately release Petitioner Reinier Alarcon Viltre. Respondents, and all other persons or entities acting in active concert or participation with them, are PERMANENTLY RESTRAINED and ENJOINED from detaining Petitioner Reinier Alarcon Viltre under 8 U.S.C. 1225. Respondents, and all other persons or entities acting in active concert or participation with them, are TEMPORARILY RESTRAINED and ENJOINED from detaining Petitioner Reinier Alarcon Viltre under 8 U.S.C. 1226(a) until at least May 26, 2026. If Respondents later detain Petitioner Reinier Alarcon Viltre under 1226(a), Respondents are DIRECTED to release him within ten daysof his detainer unless he is provided with a bond hearing before an immigration judge during that ten-day period. The Clerk is directed to close this case. The Court retains jurisdiction over this case. If Respondents fail to comply with this Order, Petitioner may move to reopen this case. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 5/13/2026. (ALL)
|
| Filing 7 PROOF of service - Executive Office for Immigration Review served on 5/4/2026. (AM) |
| Filing 6 PROOF of service - Louis Quinones, Jr., Warden served on 5/5/2026. (AM) |
| Filing 5 PROOF of service - John W. Mina, Sheriff served on 5/4/2026. (AM) |
| Filing 4 PROOF of service - Garrett Ripa served on 5/4/2026. (AM) |
|
Filing 3
ENDORSED ORDER directing Respondents to SHOW CAUSE on or before May 8, 2026 why #1 the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus should not be granted. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order and the #1 Petition via certified mail to Respondents. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 4/27/2026. (LNG)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Carlos E. Mendoza and Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price. New case number: 6:26-cv-894-CEM-LHP. (AA) |
| Filing 1 Verified PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Federal (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AFLMDC-24832923) filed by Reinier Alarcon Viltre. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Appendix, #3 Exhibit Booking Blotter and ICE Locator, #4 Exhibit Notice to Appear, #5 Exhibit Notice of Appeal - Pending, #6 Proposed Summons, #7 Disclosure Statement, #8 Designation of Lead Counsel)(Flores, Alvaro) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
