Spikes v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Vergie Spikes |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 6:2026cv00937 |
| April 28, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Nathan W Hill |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ENDORSED ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff may proceed in this action without prepayment of the filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nathan W. Hill on 5/4/2026. (WRT)
|
| Filing 6 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Nathan W. Hill. New case number: 6:26-cv-937-NWH. (ARL) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Erik William Berger on behalf of Vergie Spikes. Lead Counsel: Erik Berger. (Berger, Erik) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Vergie Spikes. Related case(s): No (Berger, Erik) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Vergie Spikes. (Berger, Erik) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Vergie Spikes. (Berger, Erik) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. The plaintiff CONSENTS to jurisdiction of the United States magistrate judge filed by Vergie Spikes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Berger, Erik) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
