LaMountain v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Raymond D LaMountain
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Case Number: 6:2026cv01402
Filed: June 26, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Nicholas P Mizell
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 14, 2026 Filing 11 SOCIAL security transcript of administrative proceedings re #1 Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Part 002/008, #2 Part 003/008, #3 Part 004/008, #4 Part 005/008, #5 Part 006/008, #6 Part 007/008, #7 Part 008/008)(Golden, Dennis)
August 14, 2026 Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Commissioner of Social Security. (Golden, Dennis)
August 14, 2026 Filing 9 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Commissioner of Social Security. Related case(s): No (Golden, Dennis)
August 14, 2026 Filing 8 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation and Appearance by Dennis Golden on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Golden, Dennis)
July 21, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 7/21/2026. (WRW)
July 20, 2026 Filing 6 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 6:26-cv-01402-NPM. Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price no longer assigned to the case. (FLMD_CMECF_SVC01, )
June 29, 2026 Filing 5 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price. New case number: 6:26-cv-01402-LHP. (LJC)
June 26, 2026 Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Raymond D LaMountain. (Boyd, Bradley)
June 26, 2026 Filing 3 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Raymond D LaMountain. Related case(s): No (Boyd, Bradley)
June 26, 2026 Filing 2 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Bradley K. Boyd on behalf of Raymond D LaMountain. Lead Counsel: Bradley K Boyd. (Boyd, Bradley)
June 26, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-25172736). The plaintiff CONSENTS to jurisdiction of the United States magistrate judge filed by Raymond D LaMountain. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Boyd, Bradley)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LaMountain v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond D LaMountain
Represented By: Bradley K. Boyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: John F. Rudy, III
Represented By: Beverly E. Williams
Represented By: Dennis Golden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?