Rabold v. State of Florida - 18th Judicial Circuit et al
| Joshua-Wayne Rabold |
| State of Florida - 18th Judicial Circuit, Brevard County, Judge Aaron Peacock, Judge Kelly Ingram, Judge Judith Adkins, Judge Jennifer Taylor, Judge David Silverman, Judge Charles Crawford, Judge Michelle Naberhans, Yvan Llanes, Rachel Sadoff, Sheriff Robert Ivey, James Christoffel and Nikolas Rodriguez |
| 6:2026cv01475 |
| July 10, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Robert M Norway |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ENDORSED ORDER denying #15 Response to Order to Show Cause and Motion for Judicial Clarification. As this Court previously explained to Plaintiff, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure apply to his case. (See July 23, 2026 Endorsed Order, Doc. 8). Plaintiff's filing is not responsive to the Court's August 12, 2026 Order to Show Cause (Doc. 13) and therefore, the Order to Show Cause is not discharged. On or before September 15, 2026, Plaintiff shall file his Notice of Pendency of Related Actions and Disclosure Statement. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of this action without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 9/1/2026. (LNG)
|
| Filing 15 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 13 Order to show cause and MOTION for Judicial Clarification and Determination of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction of the Suit at Common Law by Joshua-Wayne Rabold. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LJC) |
Filing 14
ENDORSED ORDER denying #12 Motion for Hearing / Conference for the reasons previously stated. See Dkt. 8 and Dkt. 11. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Norway on 8/13/2026. (JBS)
|
Filing 13
ENDORSED ORDER directing Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE within fourteen days from the date of this Order as to why they did not comply with the Court's #5 Initial Order and the Local Rules by failing to file their Notice of Pendency of Related Actions and Disclosure Statement. Alternatively, Plaintiff may cure their failure by fully complying with the Initial Order within fourteen days, thereby discharging the order to show cause. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of this action without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 8/12/2026. (MEH)
|
| Filing 12 Emergency MOTION for Hearing re #10 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically to Challenge Jurisdiction of Endorsed Order by Joshua-Wayne Rabold. (chambers notified) (LJC) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/10/2026: #1 Attachment) (LJC). Modified on 8/10/2026 to add attachment (LJC). |
Filing 11
ENDORSED ORDER denying #10 Motion. The Court construes Plaintiff's Motion as a motion for reconsideration. Reconsideration is an extraordinary remedy which will only be granted upon a showing of one of the following: (1) an intervening change in law, (2) the discovery of new evidence which was not available at the time the Court rendered its decision, or (3) the need to correct clear error or manifest injustice. Fla. Coll. of Osteopathic Med., Inc. v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 12 F. Supp. 2d 1306, 1308 (M.D. Fla. 1998). Because Plaintiff asserts no meritorious reason for the extraordinary remedy of reconsideration, the Motion is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Norway on 8/6/2026. (JBS)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically to Challenge Jurisdiction of Endorsed Order, MOTION to Stay, REQUEST for oral argument by Joshua-Wayne Rabold. (LJC) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE to Joshua-Wayne Rabold - A pro se litigant may consent to receive Notices of Electronic Filings by completing the consent form linked #here or by visiting the court's website at https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/litigants-without-lawyers. (RPB) |
Filing 8
ENDORSED ORDER granting in part and denying in part #7 Motion for Clarification. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "govern the procedure in all civil actions and proceedings in the United States district courts, except as stated in Rule 81. They should be construed, administered, and employed by the court and the parties to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding." See Fed. R. Civ. P. 1. The Motion as it requests oral argument on this issue is denied.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Norway on 7/23/2026. (JBS)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Clarification re 4 Order on Motion to Compel,, REQUEST for oral argument by Joshua-Wayne Rabold. (LJC) |
Filing 6
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 7/21/2026. (ALL)
|
Filing 5
INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 7/21/2026. (ALL)
|
Filing 4
ENDORSED ORDER denying #3 Motion to Compel. The Motion does not make a showing that Plaintiff has engaged in any proper discovery mechanisms outlined by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Norway on 7/15/2026. (JBS)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Compel Production of Jurisdictional Records by Joshua-Wayne Rabold. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (WLB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Norway. |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of Joshua-Wayne Rabold re: #1 Complaint, by Joshua-Wayne Rabold. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (WLB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, Filing fee $405.00, receipt number ORL119179, filed by Joshua-Wayne Rabold. (Attachments: #1 Cover Page for Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Mailing Envelope) (WLB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.