Knirnschild v. Blackmon et al
| Bradley David Knirnschild |
| Sheriff Christopher A. Blackmon, Deputy Sheriff Derick Lopez-Feliciano, Jessica Matos, Officer Corrections Officer ID No. 3141, Supervisory Official J Kenney, APRN D Coley and Does 1 through 20 |
| 6:2026cv01552 |
| July 17, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Anne-Leigh Gaylord Moe |
| Leslie Hoffman Price |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Remark: Plaintiff - (Prisoner No. 569538 - DC No. X78698 as stated in the docket) located in Osceola County Jail - 402 Simpson Road, Kissimmee. Per the complaint mailing address 2747 N. Poinciana BlvdApt. 13, Kissimmee is to be used for mailing documents in the case. (MLB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Bradley David Knirnschild. (Attachments: #1 Account Statement, #2 Mailing Envelope)(MLB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by Bradley David Knirnschild. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Civil Cover Sheet, #11 Mailing Envelope)(MLB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
