Russell v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
| Renee Russell and Renee Perez |
| PennyMac Loan Services, LLC and Private National Mortgage Acceptance Company, LLC |
| 6:2026cv01650 |
| July 29, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Julie S Sneed |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1451 E.R.I.S.A. |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Renee Russell - A pro se litigant may consent to receive Notices of Electronic Filings by completing the consent form linked #here or by visiting the court's website at https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/litigants-without-lawyers. (LJC) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel by Renee Russell. (LJC) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically for CM/ECF Electronic Filing Access by Renee Russell. (LJC) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS issued as to PennyMac Loan Services, LLC. (LJC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PennyMac Loan Services, LLC with Jury Demand Filing fee $405, receipt number 119335 filed by Renee Russell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Civil Cover Sheet)(LJC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
