Johnson-Hathorn v. Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc., et al
| Tracie N. Johnson-Hathorn |
| Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc., Carlisle Syntec Systems doing business as Carlisle Construction Materials, Mule-Hide Products Co., Inc. and XYZ Roofing Company |
| 6:2026cv01884 |
| August 26, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Paul G Byron |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Alejandro J. Gonzalez of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MLB) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Paul G. Byron and Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:26-cv-01884-PGB-DCI. (MLB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-25461517) filed by Tracie N. Johnson-Hathorn. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gonzalez, Alejandro) Modified on 8/26/2026 to edit the docket text (MLB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
