Bryson v. Jr. Davis Construction
Plaintiff: Keith Bryson
Defendant: Jr. Davis Construction
Case Number: 6:2026cv02004
Filed: September 8, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Nathan W Hill
Referring Judge: Carlos E Mendoza
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2026 Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Keith Bryson. (EMH) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nathan W. Hill. (Main Document 2 replaced on 9/10/2026 to reflect correct order of pages) (EMH). Modified on 9/10/2026 (EMH).
September 8, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jr. Davis Construction filed by Keith Bryson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(EMH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bryson v. Jr. Davis Construction
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Bryson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jr. Davis Construction
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?