Stacy A. Scott v. Navy Federal Credit Union et al
| Stacy A. Scott |
| Navy Federal Credit Union, Green Dot Corporation and Apple, Inc. |
| 6:2026cv02038 |
| September 11, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of a related action Stacy A. Scott v. Navy Federal Credit Union, M.D. Fl. Case No. 6:26-cv-386-JSS-DCI per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Navy Federal Credit Union. Related case(s): Yes (Luster, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Navy Federal Credit Union. (Luster, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Daniel James Luster on behalf of Navy Federal Credit Union. Lead Counsel: Daniel Luster. (Luster, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County, case number 2026-SC022012-O filed in State Court on August 5, 2026. Filing fee $405, receipt number AFLMDC-25537461 filed by Navy Federal Credit Union. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Pleadings, #2 State Court COMPLAINT, #3 State Court Docket Sheet, #4 State Court Other Documents, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Luster, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
