Cotterill v. O.F. Mossberg & Sons, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jason Cotterill
Defendant: Olin Corporation, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and O.F. Mossberg & Sons, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2007cv00262
Filed: February 9, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Tampa Office
County: Hillsborough
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. McCoun
Presiding Judge: James S. Moody
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 205 ORDER: Plaintiff's motion to strike the expert testimony of Ronald R. Bell 182 is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification of Rulings and for Possible Amendment to the Scheduling Order Permitting Supplement to Expert Mr. Butters Opi nions 189 is DENIED. Plaintiff has withdrawn his Motion to Determine Subject of Daubert Hearing 190 ; the Clerk is directed to TERMINATE that motion. Plaintiff's Motion to Allow Telephonic Appearance at Daubert hearing 194 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion in Limine Re: Demonstrative Exhibits 180 is DENIED without prejudice for lack of specificity. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 3/5/2009. (LN)
February 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 185 ORDER: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 166 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in favor of Defendants as to Count V and denied as to Plaintiff's remaining claims. Defendant Mossber g's Motion to Preclude Testimony and Opinions of Plaintiff's Designated Expert Tommy Burttschell 167 is DENIED. Defendant Mossberg's Motion to Preclude Testimony and Opinions of Plaintiff's Designated Expert John Butters 168 is GRANTED in part. The Court will conduct a hearing at a later date to address the remaining issues raised in this motion 168 . Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 2/12/2009. (LN)
February 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 178 ORDER denying without prejudice 155 Plaintiff's Third Request for Court Order Permitting Destructive Testing. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 2/5/2009. (LN)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cotterill v. O.F. Mossberg & Sons, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Olin Corporation
Represented By: Randal K. Mullendore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Represented By: Wendy B. Accardi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: O.F. Mossberg & Sons, Inc.
Represented By: Timon V. Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Cotterill
Represented By: Carolyn M. Holt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?