Ronet v. City of Tampa Police Department, et al
| Jean-Pierre Ronet |
| City of Tampa Police Department, Mohammed Ashrat Bradelia and Hillsborough County State Attorney |
| 8:2008cv02076 |
| October 9, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Hillsborough |
| Mark A. Pizzo |
| James D. Whittemore |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER adopting 49 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; denying 48 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency filed by Jean-Pierre Ronet. Signed by Judge James D. Whittemore on 11/17/2009. (KE)
|
|
Filing
49
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 48 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency filed by Jean-Pierre Ronet, recommending denial of motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Pizzo on 10/27/2009. (AGG)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER adopting 40 & 41 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; granting 16 and 26 Motions to Dismiss Complaint. The clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge James D. Whittemore on 8/20/2009. (KE)
|
|
Filing
41
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 26 MOTION to dismiss Complaint on Behalf of Lori Ellingsworth filed by Hillsborough County State Attorney. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Pizzo on 7/22/2009. (AGG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
