R-Stream, LLC et al v. Wingstop Restaurants, Inc.
| R-Stream, LLC and Restaurant Stream, L.C. |
| Wingstop Restaurants, Inc. |
| 8:2008cv02221 |
| November 5, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Pinellas |
| Virginia M. Hernandez Covington |
| Elizabeth A. Jenkins |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER: Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 15 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: Defendant is entitled to Judgment on the Pleadings as to Count Four of Plaintiff's complaint (Plaintiff's tortious interfere nce with a business relationship claim). Further, Count Two of Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with leave to amend within ten days of the date of this Order. If Count Two is not amended in a timely fashion, Count Two will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 10/13/2009. (KAK)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER: In the instance that Plaintiffs oppose Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 15 , Plaintiffs are directed to file a response in opposition to the motion within ELEVEN DAYS of the date of this Order. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/10/2009. (KAK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
