Arrow Electronics, Inc. v. Gurba
Plaintiff: Arrow Electronics, Inc.
Defendant: Stephen L. Gurba
Case Number: 8:2008cv02251
Filed: November 12, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Pinellas
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth A. Jenkins
Presiding Judge: James S. Moody
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 31 120-DAY ORDER OF DISMISSAL: All pending motions are denied as moot. Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 3/17/2010. (LN)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arrow Electronics, Inc. v. Gurba
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arrow Electronics, Inc.
Represented By: Beth-Ann E. Krimsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephen L. Gurba
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?