Abraham et al v Sandy Cove 3 Association, et al
| Andrea Abraham and Charles Abraham |
| Sandy Cove 3 Association and Glen J. Engelbrecht |
| 8:2009cv00107 |
| July 30, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Elizabeth A. Jenkins |
| James S. Moody |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER: This cause is dismissed without prejudice. All pending motions are denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 7/30/2009. (LN)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 38 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Complaint 31 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 31, Ex. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiffs' Motion to Continue o r Alternatively Motion for Enlargement of Time for All Answering 30 is DENIED. Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend the Complaint 39 is DENIED. Plaintiffs have 20 days to amend the second, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, and ninth counts. The remaining counts are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 6/4/2009. (LN)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER: The Motion to Dismiss 27 is DENIED as moot. Defendants have 20 days to respond to the Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 2/19/2009. (LN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
