Cherry v. The Federal Communications Commission

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Florida Middle District Cherry v. The Federal Communications Commission

Cherry v. The Federal Communications Commission

Plaintiff:	Glenn W. Cherry
Defendant:	Federal Communications Commission
Case Number:	8:2009cv00680
Filed:	April 10, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office:	Freedom of Information Act Office
County:	Hillsborough
Presiding Judge:	Steven D. Merryday
Presiding Judge:	Mark A. Pizzo
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	05:0552 Freedom of Information Act

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 3, 2009	Filing 46 ORDER adopting United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Jenkins Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34). The Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Doc. 17) is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). The CLERK is directed to deny any pending motions as MOOT and to CLOSE this CASE. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 12/3/2009. (ACD)
May 1, 2009	Filing 18 ORDER: Plaintiff's verified emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction 2 and verified emergency motion for a preliminary injunction 13 are held in abeyance pending the adjudication of Defendant's motio n to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction 17 . Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction 17 within seven days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/1/2009. (KAK)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 3, 2009

Filing 46 ORDER adopting United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Jenkins Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34). The Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Doc. 17) is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). The CLERK is directed to deny any pending motions as MOOT and to CLOSE this CASE. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 12/3/2009. (ACD)

May 1, 2009

Filing 18 ORDER: Plaintiff's verified emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction 2 and verified emergency motion for a preliminary injunction 13 are held in abeyance pending the adjudication of Defendant's motio n to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction 17 . Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction 17 within seven days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/1/2009. (KAK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cherry v. The Federal Communications Commission
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Glenn W. Cherry
Represented By:	Charles W. Cherry, II
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Communications Commission
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?