Placida Professional Center, LLC et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
| Placida Professional Center, LLC, Michael B. Edwards and Sheryl A. Edwards |
| Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation |
| 8:2009cv02221 |
| October 30, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Sarasota |
| James S. Moody |
| Mark A. Pizzo |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
156
ORDER dismissing case with prejudice. All pending motions are denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 8/1/2013. (LN)
|
|
Filing
149
ORDER: Plaintiff may file an amended complaint to add the current holder of the Note and Mortgage as a party to this action. If Plaintiff elects to do so, it shall file the amended complaint within 14 days. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended c omplaint within 14 days, Defendant shall file an answer to the amended complaint (Dkt. 21) within 30 days. Defendant's motion to file a motion to dismiss is denied. Defendant may raise those issues at the summary judgment stage. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 6/18/2013. (LN)
|
|
Filing
140
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs 127 is granted in part and denied in part as stated herein. The Clerk shall enter an award of attorney's fees and costs in favor of Plaintiff Placida and against Defendant Fed eral Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Freedom Bank, in the amount of $193,175.12. Plaintiff's Request for Oral Argument on Its Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs 131 is denied as moot. This case shall remain closed. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 10/16/2012. (LN)
|
|
Filing
117
FINAL JUDGMENT: The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Placida Professional Center, LLC, and against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Freedom Bank, N.A. (See Order for details.) The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and to close this file. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 1/5/2012. (LN)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER denying 80 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 11/2/2011. (LN)
|
|
Filing
74
AMENDED ORDER: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 42 against individual Plaintiffs Michael B. Edwards and Sheryl A. Edwards is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to terminate party Plaintiffs Michael B. Edwards and Sheryl A. Edwards from this case. P laintiff Placida's Amended Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 64 with respect to the issue of liability is GRANTED. Plaintiff Placida's Amended Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 64 with respect to the issue of pre-judgment interest is DENIED. Defendant's Amended Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Motion in Limine to Exclude Appraisal Testimony of Richard Bass, MAI 62 , with respect to his proposed testimony of damages in excess of the costs to co mplete construction, is DENIED. Defendant's Amended Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Motion in Limine to Exclude Appraisal Testimony of Richard Bass, MAI 62 , with respect to his proposed testimony as to an additional 28% "Class II" discount, is GRANTED. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 10/18/2011. (LN)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 24 is GRANTED. Count One and Count Three of the Amended Complaint are dismissed. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 11/2/2010. (LN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
