Wiand v. Teng
Plaintiff: Burton W. Wiand
Defendant: Chun-Hui Teng
Case Number: 8:2010cv00187
Filed: January 19, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Tampa Office
County: Pinellas
Presiding Judge: Steven D. Merryday
Presiding Judge: Mark A. Pizzo
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting 18 Motion for Default Judgment, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment for the plaintiffs and against the defendant in the amount of $101,000.00. The Clerk of Court is further directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 3/10/2011. (SN)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wiand v. Teng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Burton W. Wiand
Represented By: Gianluca Morello
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chun-Hui Teng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?