Rodgers v. Time Customer Service, Inc.
Plaintiff: Bruce Rodgers
Defendant: Time Customer Service, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2010cv00263
Filed: January 22, 2010
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Tampa Office
County: Hillsborough
Presiding Judge: Mark A. Pizzo
Presiding Judge: James D. Whittemore
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER adopting 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; granting 19 Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment; denying all other pending motions as moot. The clerk is directed to enter judgmnet in favor of Defendant and close this case. Signed by Judge James D. Whittemore on 5/31/2011. (KE)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodgers v. Time Customer Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bruce Rodgers
Represented By: Steven E. Hovsepian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Time Customer Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?