Madura et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff: Andrzej Madura and Anna Dolinska-Madura
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Case Number: 8:2010cv00523
Filed: February 25, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Tampa Office
Presiding Judge: Virginia M. Hernandez Covington
Presiding Judge: Anthony E. Porcelli
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation 85 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal in forma pauperis 82 is DENIED. The Court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith and directs the Clerk to notify the Court of Appeals of this ruling in accordance with Rule 24(a)(4)(B), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 12/31/2013. (KAK)
November 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER: The Maduras' Rule 60(b)(2)(3)(6) Motion for Relief from July 16, 2010 Final Judgment 76 is DENIED. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 11/14/2013. (KAK)
July 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER: The following motions are denied as moot due to the dismissal of this action with prejudice: Plaintiff Anna Dolinska-Maduras Sworn Emergency Motion for Protective Order Allowing Her to Argue Her Case in Writing Instead of at Hearing 55 ; Pla intiffs Sworn Motion to Continue the July 20, 2010 Hearing 56 ; Plaintiffs Motion to Treat their Two Supplements as Supplemental Exhibits 58 ; and Plaintiffs' Motion for an Order Directing Bank of America and its Counsel to Obey Federal and th is Courts Local Rules Governing Filing, Serving, Signing the Certificate of Service 59 . Any further impertinent motions filed by pro se Plaintiffs in this dismissed case will be stricken pursuant to Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 7/22/2010. (KAK)
July 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER: Bank of America's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint 19 is GRANTED. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to terminate all pending motions and deadlines and to close this case. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 7/16/2010. (KAK)
June 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER denying as moot 10 Motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/21/2010. (KAK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Madura et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrzej Madura
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anna Dolinska-Madura
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Represented By: William P. Heller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?